Discrimination Broken Down essays

Discrimination Broken Down essays Why should a company have to lower its standards of hiring the best people? Why should a university not try to recruit the top students in the country? They shouldn ¡Ã‚ ¯t have too. However, Fred L. Pincus, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Maryland Baltimore County, would like them to change their standards in order to avoid the appearance of discrimination. In his article entitled, From Individualism to Structural Discrimination, published in Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing, Pincus breaks discrimination into three specific types. He succeeds in explaining the more common types of discrimination, but his explanation of  ¡Ã‚ °structural discrimination ¡ is not as effective and causes him to lose credibility in his argument that all three types of discrimination must be confronted if  ¡Ã‚ °racial equality is to be achieved ¡ (592). From the start of Pincus ¡Ã‚ ¯s article, he is conveying his biased opinion. He states,  ¡Ã‚ °Prejudice ¡ does not necessarily lead to discrimination ¡ and discrimination is not always caused by prejudice ¡ (586). Pincus ¡Ã‚ ¯s explanation of what discrimination is sounds like a contradiction. Everyone knows that the roots of discrimination can be found in people ¡Ã‚ ¯s prejudices. Discrimination is always caused by prejudice. Pincus uses his position as a professor of sociology to convince the reader that his opinion should be taken as fact. He references the book Black Power, written by Stokley Carmichael and Charles Hamilton. In this  ¡Ã‚ °influential book ¡ (587) the authors do differentiate discrimination into two types, individual and institutional. Pincus, however, decides to explain not two, but three types of discrimination. He calls the last type of discrimination  ¡Ã‚ °Structural discrimination. ¡ Nobody could possibly argue with Pincus about his first type of discrimination and his classification of it. It...